July 17, 2025
The GIST AI 'coach' helps language models choose between text and code to solve problems 
Sadie Harley
scientific editor
Andrew Zinin
lead editor
Editors' notes
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
preprint
trusted source
proofread
Large language models (LLMs) excel at using textual reasoning to understand the context of a document and provide a logical answer about its contents. But these same LLMs often struggle to correctly answer even the simplest math problems.
Textual reasoning is usually a less-than-ideal way to deliberate over computational or algorithmic tasks. While some LLMs can generate code like Python to handle symbolic queries, the models don't always know when to use code, or what kind of code would work best.
LLMs, it seems, may need a coach to steer them toward the best technique.
Enter CodeSteer, a smart assistant developed by MIT researchers that guides an LLM to switch between code and text generation until it correctly answers a query.
CodeSteer, itself a smaller LLM, automatically generates a series of prompts to iteratively steer a larger LLM. It reviews the model's current and previous answers after each round and provides guidance for how it can fix or refine that solution until it deems the answer is correct.
The researchers found that augmenting a larger LLM with CodeSteer boosted its accuracy on symbolic tasks, like multiplying numbers, playing Sudoku, and stacking blocks, by more than 30%. It also enabled less sophisticated models to outperform more advanced models with enhanced reasoning skills.
This advance could improve the problem-solving capabilities of LLMs for complex tasks that are especially difficult to solve with textual reasoning alone, such as generating paths for robots in uncertain environments or scheduling shipments in an international supply chain.
"There is a race to develop better and better models that are capable of doing everything, but we've taken a complementary approach. Researchers have spent years developing effective technologies and tools to tackle problems in many domains. We want to enable LLMs to select the right tools and methods, and make use of others' expertise to enhance their own capabilities," says Chuchu Fan, an associate professor of aeronautics and astronautics (AeroAstro) and principal investigator in the MIT Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems (LIDS).
Fan, the senior author of the study, is joined on a paper about the work by LIDS graduate student Yongchao Chen; AeroAstro graduate student Yilun Hao; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign graduate student Yueying Liu; and MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab Research Scientist Yang Zhang. The research will be presented at the International Conference on Machine Learning.
The paper is published on the arXiv preprint server.
An LLM 'trainer'
Ask an LLM which number is bigger, 9.11 or 9.9, and it will often give the wrong answer by using textual reasoning. But ask it to use code to answer the same question, and it can generate and execute a Python script to compare the two numbers, easily solving the problem.
Initially trained to understand and predict human language, LLMs are more likely to answer queries using text, even when code would be more effective. And while they have learned to generate code through fine-tuning, these models often generate an incorrect or less efficient version of the code.
Rather than trying to retrain a powerful LLM like GPT-4 or Claude to improve these capabilities, the MIT researchers fine-tune a smaller, lightweight LLM to guide a larger model between text and code. Fine-tuning a smaller model doesn't change the larger LLM, so there is no risk it would undermine the larger model's other abilities.
"We were also inspired by humans. In sports, a trainer may not be better than the star athlete on the team, but the trainer can still give helpful suggestions to guide the athlete. This steering method works for LLMs, too," Chen says.
This trainer, CodeSteer, works in conjunction with the larger LLM. It first reviews a query and determines whether text or code is suitable for this problem, and which sort of code would be best.
Then it generates a prompt for the larger LLM, telling it to use a coding method or textual reasoning to answer the query. The larger model follows this prompt to answer the query and sends the result back to CodeSteer, which reviews it.
If the answer is not correct, CodeSteer will continue prompting the LLM to try different things that might fix the problem, such as incorporating a search algorithm or constraint into its Python code, until the answer is correct.
"We found that, oftentimes, the larger LLM will try to be lazy and use a shorter, less efficient code that will not carry the correct symbolic calculation. We've designed CodeSteer to avoid this phenomenon," Chen says.
A symbolic checker evaluates the code's complexity and sends a signal to CodeSteer if it is too simple or inefficient. The researchers also incorporate a self-answer checker into CodeSteer, which prompts the LLM to generate code that calculates the answer to verify it is correct.
Tackling complex tasks
As the researchers designed CodeSteer, they couldn't find suitable symbolic datasets to fine-tune and test the model, since many existing benchmarks don't point out whether a certain query could be best solved with text or code.
So, they gathered a corpus of 37 complex symbolic tasks, including spatial reasoning, mathematics, order reasoning, and optimization, and built their own dataset, called SymBench. They implemented a fine-tuning approach that leverages SymBench to maximize the performance of CodeSteer.
In their experiments, CodeSteer outperformed all nine baseline methods they evaluated and boosted average accuracy from 53.3% to 86.4%. It maintains similar performance even on unseen tasks, and on a variety of LLMs.
In addition, a general-purpose model augmented with CodeSteer can achieve higher accuracy than state-of-the-art models designed to focus on complex reasoning and planning, while requiring much less computation.
"Our method uses an LLM's own capabilities. By augmenting an LLM with the ability to smartly use coding, we can take a model that is already very strong and improve its performance even more," Chen says.
In the future, the researchers want to streamline CodeSteer to speed up its iterative prompting process. In addition, they are studying how to effectively fine-tune a unified model with the ability to switch between textual reasoning and code generation, rather than relying on a separate assistant.
"The authors present an elegant solution to the critical challenge of tool utilization in LLMs. This simple yet impactful method enables state-of-the-art LLMs to achieve significant performance improvements without requiring direct fine-tuning," says Jinsung Yoon, a staff research scientist at Google Cloud AI, who was not involved with this work.
"This research represents a substantial contribution that promises to significantly enhance the application of LLMs to a diverse range of tasks with which they currently struggle."
"Their success in training a smaller, specialized model to strategically guide larger, advanced models is particularly impactful," adds Chi Wang, a senior staff scientist at Google DeepMind who was not involved with this work.
"This intelligent collaboration among diverse AI 'agents' paves the way for more robust and versatile applications in complex real-world scenarios."
More information: Yongchao Chen et al, CodeSteer: Symbolic-Augmented Language Models via Code/Text Guidance, arXiv (2025). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2502.04350
Journal information: arXiv Provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology
This story is republished courtesy of MIT News (web.mit.edu/newsoffice/), a popular site that covers news about MIT research, innovation and teaching.
Citation: AI 'coach' helps language models choose between text and code to solve problems (2025, July 17) retrieved 17 July 2025 from https://techxplore.com/news/2025-07-ai-language-text-code-problems.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
Explore further
GPT-4 matches human performance on analogical reasoning tasks, study shows 0 shares
Feedback to editors
