Panama City Mayor Mayer Mizrachi sparked excitement and concern across financial and shipping industries when he proposed that ships using the Panama Canal could pay their tolls in Bitcoin to get priority passage.
Supporters say Bitcoin will reduce banking delays and high fees related to traditional financial institutions and, in turn, help Panama update its financial systems, attract more international shipping business, and give small shipping companies easier access to global trade.
However, critics argue that because Bitcoin prices are highly volatile, the policy might expose Panama to new forms of regulatory pressure, financial risk, and geopolitical backlash from countries skeptical of crypto or fear its role in avoiding traditional finance systems.
The central question facing Panama is this: Will Mizrachi’s Bitcoin plan improve global trade or risk the economy with a volatile, uncertain asset?
Supporters say Bitcoin brings speed and global attention
Supporters say using crypto allows smaller shipping companies without easy access to big banks to move goods faster and at lower cost by reducing slow banking steps.
A Bitcoin-friendly policy could also attract tech companies, blockchain startups, and skilled workers to Panama, transforming the country into a hub for digital innovation and new economic growth.
Similarly, Bitcoin, as a global currency, makes payments efficient for everyone involved in shipping because users avoid costly dollar exchanges or bank fees. Mizrachi sees Bitcoin not just as a payment method but as a powerful tool to grow Panama’s role in the world and keep the Panama Canal competitive in a digital economy where speed and technology matter more than ever.
Critics warn Bitcoin could hurt Panama’s stability
Critics warn that the canal could quickly face massive shortfalls in revenue if Bitcoin’s price crashes after payment is made because the coin’s value can rise or fall by thousands of dollars in a single day.
They say canal tolls generate over a billion dollars each year to support key parts of Panama’s budget, and a short-term dip in value could throw off financial planning and force the government to scramble for backup funds.
Bitcoin is also accepted in some countries and banned in a few nations, while other states still don’t know how to regulate it.
Critics argue that Panama risks creating legal complications for shipping firms in certain countries and forcing them to choose between using the canal or staying compliant with their laws. Once enough countries face these choices, Panama could see a drop in canal traffic.
Crypto payments depend on digital infrastructure that can be vulnerable to cyberattacks or human error, whereas high-value transactions involving giant cargo ships need secure systems to prevent fraud, theft, and hacking when dealing with high-value transactions.
Critics warn that rushing into Bitcoin adoption could expose sensitive data or lose funds to malicious actors, and the consequences could ripple across the shipping industry.
Finally, managing both traditional currency and Bitcoin systems in parallel calls for new technology, additional personnel training, more stringent internal controls, and clear policies for addressing mistakes or disputes. The Panama Canal is undergoing climate stress, water shortages, and competition among trade routes, so the flow of cryptocurrency could be a stretch for the system, and a few tiny mistakes could be very expensive.
At the heart of the debate is one big question: can Panama afford to anchor its most valuable and reliable economic engine to the world’s most volatile and least regulated asset class? Critics argue that doing so could turn a stable source of revenue into a gamble and expose Panama to financial and political shocks it can’t control.
The public and experts give mixed reactions
Supporters in crypto communities quickly praised the idea as bold and forward-thinking because it shows that Panama is ready to lead rather than follow in the digital economy. They say it positions Panama ahead of countries still debating basic crypto regulation, and some even compare it to early internet policies that helped Estonia and Singapore become tech hubs.
International headlines also highlight Panama’s potential to become the next global center for crypto innovation. Articles in blockchain news outlets and digital finance blogs portray Panama as a country willing to experiment while others hesitate during a time when many governments crack down on digital currencies rather than embrace them.
However, Traditional financial institutions in Panama and abroad argue that allowing Bitcoin payments for canal tolls could increase money laundering (AML) risks because tracing crypto transactions can be complicated without strict oversight.
They argue that the intersection of crypto and infrastructure payments would complicate cash flow management, auditing, and international payment system coordination and pose a greater threat to stability and security than innovation.
The proposal has also triggered political controversy within Panama’s own government as several lawmakers and national officials accuse Mayor Mizrachi of overstepping his role. They argue that the mayor is pushing a risky financial agenda without proper input from economic advisors, central agencies, or national leaders. Some even accuse him of using the idea to build personal political clout rather than to serve the public interest.
Panama faces big choice between innovation and risk
Panama would be the first country to connect a major international trade route to cryptocurrency, leading ports, shipping companies, and governments to contemplate different uses for blockchain and digital assets in free-trade zones or bonded shipping hubs.
However, the risks are just as real as the rewards because global watchdogs such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) or the International Monetary Fund (IMF) might raise concerns about transparency, compliance, or financial risk.
Panama’s decision goes beyond Bitcoin and asks a bigger question: Can national governments integrate digital finance into their critical systems without breaking global trust? Can they modernize without introducing chaos?
What happens in Panama could shape how other nations move forward, not just with Bitcoin but with the next generation of digital infrastructure in global trade.
